Skip to main content
Sign in
Create Account
Cart
Toggle navigation
Loading
Home
Hidden
Home
2
Guides
/
Global FinTech Guide
Name
Global FinTech Guide
Country _ Name
Bolivia
SectionTitle
Asset and portfolio management
Body
FinTechs belonging to this category offer asset and portfolio management services via an internet platform or software programs and usually manage and dispose of the assets of their customers long or short term according to their specifications without actually holding the property or the possession of those assets. FinTechs, which provide information about and access to overnight or time deposit accounts at national and foreign banks and which execute the transactions to these accounts, also belong to this category. Some FinTechs however only act on request of the customer.
Aside from that some FinTechs offer software or internet solutions enabling users to manage and plan their personal finances on their own by providing graphics, overviews and compilations of their financial data and sometimes indicating financial risks or opportunities, but without actually managing the assets.
Introduction
Attitude of the country towards modern asset and portfolio management services
Bolivia's attitude toward modern asset and portfolio management services can be characterized as cautious but gradually evolving, especially in the context of broader financial and regulatory reforms.
Regulatory Environment: Conservative but Opening
Highly regulated financial sector: Bolivia’s financial system is overseen by the Autoridad de Supervisión del Sistema Financiero (ASFI), with a strong focus on inclusion, systemic risk control, and state oversight
Limited framework for asset-management FinTechs: There is currently no specific regulation for robo-advisors or digital portfolio platforms, creating both a barrier for entry and potential space for future regulation.
Complex investment vehicles (derivatives, ETFs, etc.): Legal structures for complex instruments remain underdeveloped and rare in Bolivia.
Current Market Limitations
Underdeveloped capital markets:
The Bolivian Stock Exchange (BBV) is small, with limited liquidity and minimal equity listings—most securities are bonds or commercial paper.
Equity trading is virtually non-existent, and participation is limited even for institutional actors
Low participation by retail investors:
Most Bolivians favor traditional banking products (savings, term deposits) rather than modern investment vehicles, due to limited familiarity or trust.
Few local providers: Only a small number of asset managers serve Bolivia, typically focused on institutional or high-net-worth clients; retail-oriented investment solutions remain scarce.
Policy Priorities and State Role
Bolivia emphasizes economic sovereignty and keeps strategic sectors under public control, which makes it cautious about unregulated or foreign-driven financial innovations.
At the same time, the country is gradually adopting digitalization and FinTech, especially in payments and microfinance. This trend may expand to investment management if it supports financial inclusion and transparency.
Legal affairs
Obligations and requirements to provide asset and portfolio management, or ancillary services described above
In Bolivia, the provision of asset and portfolio management services, as well as ancillary financial services, is subject to strict regulatory oversight by ASFI under the framework of the Ley N° 393 de Servicios Financieros (Financial Services Law) and its related regulations.
Legal and Regulatory Framework
Main Law:
Ley N° 393
(August 2013)
Governs financial intermediation and financial auxiliary services, including investment and portfolio management.
Emphasizes financial inclusion, consumer protection, and social/economic function of financial services.
Regulator:
ASFI
Oversees licensing, supervision, prudential norms, and consumer protection.
No financial services company can operate legally without ASFI’s prior authorization.
Key Requirements to Obtain Authorization To operate legally, companies must undergo a rigorous licensing process, including:
Application Requirements:
Incorporation under Bolivian law
Corporate purpose aligned with financial services
Business plan and financial model
Minimum capital requirement,defined by ASFI according to service type
Organizational structure, including governance, risk, and compliance frameworks
Technological and operational capacity(especially relevant for digital or automated platforms)
AML/CFT compliance program(Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism)
Internal audit and control systems
Ongoing Obligations
Operational and Reporting Duties:
Periodic financial statements and risk reports to ASFI
Client disclosure and transparency obligations (fees, risks, product features)
Proper custody and segregation of client assets
Ongoing compliance with AML/CFT regulations
Fit and proper requirements for directors, managers, and key personnel
Ancillary Services (Digital, Robo-advisors, Analytics, etc.) While Bolivia has no specific framework for digital portfolio tools or robo-advisors, any automated or algorithmic service that involves advice or asset handlingwould still fall under ASFI’s prudential supervision, and must comply with:
Authorization as a financial auxiliary service provider
Cybersecurity and data protection standards (per ASFI Circulars)
Possible classification under outsourced services, subject to additional controls
Additional comments regarding the legal situation for asset and portfolio management services or what FinTech’s must be aware of in this business area
Regulatory Rigidity vs. Innovation Gap
Bolivia has a strong, state-centered regulatory model (under Ley N° 393), where financial activity is tightly supervised and prioritized based on social utility and economic inclusion.
The framework does not yet provide tailored rules for modern digital asset management (e.g., robo-advisors, algorithmic funds, tokenized assets), which creates a legal gray area and barrier to innovation.
The absence of explicit legal categories for FinTech asset management may deter foreign or tech-driven firms from entering the market without a conservative legal structure and local allies. No Regulatory Sandbox (Yet)
Unlike several Latin American countries (Peru, Colombia, Mexico), Bolivia does not offer a regulatory sandbox to test innovative financial services in a controlled environment.
FinTechs in asset management must comply fully with traditional licensing, which increases time, cost, and complexity.
Capital Controls and Currency Restrictions
Bolivia enforces currency controls and foreign exchange restrictions, especially involving dollar-denominated investments.
Cross-border transactions in asset management may be heavily scrutinized, especially if funds are moved abroad or originate offshore.
These factors limit the development of globally diversified portfolios accessible to Bolivian clients through local platforms.
Consumer Protection & Risk Disclosure
The law requires clear, fair, and complete information about investment risks, costs, and structures—this is especially relevant for tech-based or app-driven investment services where UX design must align with legal transparency.
ASFI emphasizes financial literacy and investor protection, particularly to avoid misleading retail clients unfamiliar with portfolio risk.
Restrictions on Advertising and Client Acquisition
Marketing financial services—including online advertising, social media campaigns, or influencer-based promotion—is subject to regulation and cannot be deceptive or overly aggressive.
ASFI may interpret unauthorized digital outreach by unlicensed entities as illegal promotion of financial intermediation, potentially leading to sanctions or blockings
Economic conditions
Market size for asset and portfolio management services and biggest companies in this business area
Market Overview of Asset and Portfolio Management Services in Bolivia (2025)
The asset and portfolio management market in Bolivia is still small and less developed compared to neighboring countries.
The industry manages around USD 600–800 million in assets, mainly through:
Investment funds (Fondos de Inversión)
Trust and fiduciary services
Private banking portfolios
By contrast, countries like Peru and Colombia manage over USD 10–15 billion in assets.
Bolivia’s limited capital markets and low investor participation keep the market size relatively small.
Growth (2020–2025)
The market is growing at an estimated 6–8% annual rate.
Growth is mainly driven by:
Institutional investors like pension funds and mutual funds
Wealthier individuals in cities such as La Paz, Santa Cruz, and Cochabamba
Increasing demand for diversified savings and investment options
Biggest Asset Management Companies in Bolivia
BISA SAFI
One of the oldest and most established firms.
Offers mutual funds, fixed income portfolios, and structured investments.
Has a strong base of institutional clients.
Futuro SAFI
Linked to Futuro de Bolivia AFP (pension fund).
Focuses on collective investment funds, mainly fixed income and real estate.
Known for conservative investment strategies.
Credifondo SAFI
Connected to Banco de Crédito BCP Bolivia.
Manages mutual funds and portfolios.
Benefits from strong bank distribution channels.
Fondos Ecofuturo SAFI
Associated with Banco Ecofuturo, which focuses on microfinance.
Provides investment products accessible to lower-income investors.
Reflects Bolivia’s focus on financial inclusion.
Other Important Institutions
Bolsa Boliviana de Valores (BBV): Manages trading of investment products and oversees the market.
Banco Unión: A state bank that channels public investment funds, but does not manage assets directly.
Pension Funds (AFPs): Manage large amounts of long-term assets in regulated pension schemes, not individual investment portfolios.
Additional comments regarding the economic situation for asset and portfolio management services or what FinTech’s must be aware of in this business area
Key Challenges for Asset Management and FinTech in Bolivia (2025)
Macroeconomic Pressure
Stable for years but now facing falling reserves and currency strain.
Investors prefer short-term, low-risk products.
Shallow Capital Market
Few investment options; mostly government bonds and bank CDs.
Limits portfolio diversification and FinTech innovation.
High Informality & Low Financial Literacy
Over 60% informal workers, making client verification hard.
Low investment knowledge, especially outside cities.
Focus on Financial Inclusion
Services seen as elitist face resistance.
Micro-investing and community finance are encouraged.
Currency Controls
Strict limits on foreign currency use and dollar outflows.
USD-based or international products face regulatory hurdles.
Loading
BackToCountry
Hidden
Hidden
Back to country
Bolivia
2
Switch country
Global overview
Authors
Loading
Name
Organisation
Email
Hidden
Hidden
Paula Bauer
C. R. & F. Rojas Abogados
[email protected]
0
2409
Close
Choose country
Loading
Hidden
Hidden
Albania
158
2
Argentina
503
2
Australia
173
2
Austria
668
2
Bolivia
1001
2
Bosnia and Herzegovina
188
2
Bulgaria
967
2
Canada
143
2
Chile
233
2
China
248
2
Colombia
263
2
Costa Rica
278
2
Croatia
293
2
Czech Republic
803
2
Dominican Republic
818
2
Finland
918
2
France
713
2
Germany
128
2
Hong Kong
728
2
Hungary
338
2
Ireland
683
2
Italy
323
2
Japan
838
2
Kenya
984
2
Korea, Republic of
353
2
Malaysia
653
2
Mexico
623
2
Montenegro
368
2
New Zealand
383
2
Nigeria
893
2
North Macedonia
428
2
Peru
413
2
Philippines
398
2
Poland
473
2
Portugal
488
2
Romania
788
2
Russia
906
2
Saudi Arabia
870
2
Serbia
458
2
Singapore
932
2
Slovenia
518
2
Spain
533
2
Switzerland
698
2
Thailand
548
2
Turkey
743
2
United Kingdom
773
2
United Rep of Tanzania
758
2
United States
578
2
Vietnam
951
2
×
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##